M-Wakili

Ask a lawyer:
Write a trademark opposition filing for a client's competing brand

Trademark Opposition Filing

This document is a sample trademark opposition filing. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney to discuss your specific legal needs.

1. Introduction

This opposition is filed by [Your Client Name], a company duly incorporated and registered under the laws of Kenya, with its principal place of business at [Your Client Address]. [Your Client Name] is the owner of the trademark [Your Client Trademark] for [Your Client Goods/Services].

[Your Client Name] opposes the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] for [Opponent Goods/Services] filed by [Opponent Name], a company duly incorporated and registered under the laws of Kenya, with its principal place of business at [Opponent Address].

2. Grounds for Opposition

[Your Client Name] opposes the registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] on the following grounds:

  • Likelihood of Confusion: The trademark [Opponent Trademark] is confusingly similar to [Your Client Trademark] in appearance, sound, and meaning. This similarity is likely to cause confusion among consumers, who may mistakenly believe that the goods or services offered under [Opponent Trademark] are associated with [Your Client Name] or its products.

  • Prior Use: [Your Client Name] has been using the trademark [Your Client Trademark] in Kenya for [Number] years for [Your Client Goods/Services]. This prior use establishes [Your Client Name]'s rights in the trademark and creates a likelihood of confusion with the proposed trademark [Opponent Trademark].

  • Acquired Distinctiveness: The trademark [Your Client Trademark] has acquired distinctiveness in Kenya through its use and advertising. Consumers in Kenya readily associate [Your Client Trademark] with [Your Client Name] and its products. The proposed trademark [Opponent Trademark] is likely to dilute the distinctiveness of [Your Client Trademark] and harm [Your Client Name]'s goodwill.

3. Evidence

In support of its opposition, [Your Client Name] submits the following evidence:

  • Trademark Registration Certificate: A copy of the trademark registration certificate for [Your Client Trademark] issued by the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI).

  • Affidavit of Use: An affidavit from [Your Client Name] attesting to the use of the trademark [Your Client Trademark] in Kenya for [Number] years.

  • Marketing Materials: Samples of marketing materials, such as advertisements, brochures, and packaging, that feature the trademark [Your Client Trademark].

  • Survey Evidence: A survey conducted by [Your Client Name] that demonstrates the likelihood of confusion between the trademarks [Your Client Trademark] and [Opponent Trademark].

4. Case Law

The following case laws support [Your Client Name]'s opposition:

  • Coca-Cola Company v. The Kenya Bottlers Limited (2003) eKLR: This case involved a dispute over the use of the trademark "Coca-Cola" in Kenya. The court held that the trademark "Coca-Cola" had acquired distinctiveness in Kenya and that any use of a similar trademark was likely to cause confusion among consumers.

  • East African Breweries Limited v. Kenya Breweries Limited (2008) eKLR: This case involved a dispute over the use of the trademark "Tusker" in Kenya. The court held that the trademark "Tusker" had acquired distinctiveness in Kenya and that any use of a similar trademark was likely to cause confusion among consumers.

5. Relief Requested

[Your Client Name] respectfully requests that the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) deny the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] for [Opponent Goods/Services] filed by [Opponent Name].

6. Conclusion

[Your Client Name] believes that the registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] would infringe upon its rights in the trademark [Your Client Trademark] and cause irreparable harm to its business. [Your Client Name] respectfully requests that the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) grant its opposition and deny the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark].

TLDR

[Your Client Name] opposes the registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] because it is confusingly similar to [Your Client Trademark], [Your Client Name] has prior use of the trademark, and [Your Client Trademark] has acquired distinctiveness in Kenya.


Trademark Opposition Filing Document

Trademark Opposition Filing

Case Name: [Your Client Name] v. [Opponent Name]

Trademark: [Opponent Trademark]

Applicant: [Opponent Name]

Opponent: [Your Client Name]

Date: [Date]

1. Introduction

This opposition is filed by [Your Client Name], a company duly incorporated and registered under the laws of Kenya, with its principal place of business at [Your Client Address]. [Your Client Name] is the owner of the trademark [Your Client Trademark] for [Your Client Goods/Services].

[Your Client Name] opposes the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] for [Opponent Goods/Services] filed by [Opponent Name], a company duly incorporated and registered under the laws of Kenya, with its principal place of business at [Opponent Address].

2. Grounds for Opposition

[Your Client Name] opposes the registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] on the following grounds:

  • Likelihood of Confusion: The trademark [Opponent Trademark] is confusingly similar to [Your Client Trademark] in appearance, sound, and meaning. This similarity is likely to cause confusion among consumers, who may mistakenly believe that the goods or services offered under [Opponent Trademark] are associated with [Your Client Name] or its products.

  • Prior Use: [Your Client Name] has been using the trademark [Your Client Trademark] in Kenya for [Number] years for [Your Client Goods/Services]. This prior use establishes [Your Client Name]'s rights in the trademark and creates a likelihood of confusion with the proposed trademark [Opponent Trademark].

  • Acquired Distinctiveness: The trademark [Your Client Trademark] has acquired distinctiveness in Kenya through its use and advertising. Consumers in Kenya readily associate [Your Client Trademark] with [Your Client Name] and its products. The proposed trademark [Opponent Trademark] is likely to dilute the distinctiveness of [Your Client Trademark] and harm [Your Client Name]'s goodwill.

3. Evidence

In support of its opposition, [Your Client Name] submits the following evidence:

  • Trademark Registration Certificate: A copy of the trademark registration certificate for [Your Client Trademark] issued by the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI).

  • Affidavit of Use: An affidavit from [Your Client Name] attesting to the use of the trademark [Your Client Trademark] in Kenya for [Number] years.

  • Marketing Materials: Samples of marketing materials, such as advertisements, brochures, and packaging, that feature the trademark [Your Client Trademark].

  • Survey Evidence: A survey conducted by [Your Client Name] that demonstrates the likelihood of confusion between the trademarks [Your Client Trademark] and [Opponent Trademark].

4. Case Law

The following case laws support [Your Client Name]'s opposition:

  • Coca-Cola Company v. The Kenya Bottlers Limited (2003) eKLR: This case involved a dispute over the use of the trademark "Coca-Cola" in Kenya. The court held that the trademark "Coca-Cola" had acquired distinctiveness in Kenya and that any use of a similar trademark was likely to cause confusion among consumers.

  • East African Breweries Limited v. Kenya Breweries Limited (2008) eKLR: This case involved a dispute over the use of the trademark "Tusker" in Kenya. The court held that the trademark "Tusker" had acquired distinctiveness in Kenya and that any use of a similar trademark was likely to cause confusion among consumers.

5. Relief Requested

[Your Client Name] respectfully requests that the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) deny the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] for [Opponent Goods/Services] filed by [Opponent Name].

6. Conclusion

[Your Client Name] believes that the registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark] would infringe upon its rights in the trademark [Your Client Trademark] and cause irreparable harm to its business. [Your Client Name] respectfully requests that the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) grant its opposition and deny the application for registration of the trademark [Opponent Trademark].

Dated this [Date] day of [Month], [Year].

[Your Client Name]

By: [Your Name]

[Your Client Address]

[Your Client Phone Number]

[Your Client Email Address]


Sources:

  • Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI)

  • Coca-Cola Company v. The Kenya Bottlers Limited (2003) eKLR

  • East African Breweries Limited v. Kenya Breweries Limited (2008) eKLR

Answered by mwakili.com