M-Wakili

Ask a lawyer:
Write a post-conviction relief petition for a client claiming ineffective assistance of counsel

Post-Conviction Relief Petition

Introduction

This petition for post-conviction relief is filed by [Your Full Name], the petitioner, who was convicted of [Offence] in the [Court Name] on [Date]. The petitioner seeks to have his conviction vacated and a new trial granted on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction

  2. Factual Background

  3. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

    • Failure to Investigate and Present a Defense

    • Failure to Object to Improper Evidence

    • Failure to Advise on Plea Bargain

  4. Prejudice

  5. Relief Requested

  6. Conclusion

Factual Background

The petitioner was charged with [Offence] in the [Court Name] on [Date]. The charges stemmed from [Briefly describe the facts of the case]. The petitioner was represented by [Name of Attorney] at trial.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

The petitioner alleges that his trial counsel, [Name of Attorney], provided ineffective assistance of counsel, which violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are based on the following:

1. Failure to Investigate and Present a Defense
  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to adequately investigate the case and present a viable defense.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to interview potential witnesses who could have provided exculpatory evidence.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to obtain and present expert testimony that could have supported the petitioner's defense.

2. Failure to Object to Improper Evidence
  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of improper evidence at trial.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of hearsay evidence.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of evidence that was irrelevant or prejudicial.

3. Failure to Advise on Plea Bargain
  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to advise the petitioner of a plea bargain offer that was available to him.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to adequately explain the terms of the plea bargain offer to the petitioner.

  • The petitioner's trial counsel failed to advise the petitioner of the potential consequences of rejecting the plea bargain offer.

Prejudice

The petitioner was prejudiced by his trial counsel's ineffective assistance of counsel. The petitioner would have had a different outcome at trial if his trial counsel had provided effective assistance.

Relief Requested

The petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

  • Vacate the petitioner's conviction.

  • Grant the petitioner a new trial.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant his petition for post-conviction relief.

TLDR

The petitioner claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel, which violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are based on the failure to investigate and present a defense, failure to object to improper evidence, and failure to advise on plea bargain. The petitioner was prejudiced by his trial counsel's ineffective assistance of counsel. The petitioner requests that this Court vacate his conviction and grant him a new trial.

Sources

  • The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)

  • United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984)

Case Laws

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984): This landmark case established the two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The petitioner must show that (1) counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the outcome of the proceeding would have been different.

  • United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984): This case established that there are certain circumstances where a court can presume prejudice from ineffective assistance of counsel, such as when counsel is completely absent or when counsel is so ineffective that the trial is a farce or a sham.


Sample Post-Conviction Relief Petition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT [Court Location]

CRIMINAL CASE NO. [Case Number]

[Your Full Name],

Petitioner,

VERSUS

REPUBLIC,

Respondent.

PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

COMES NOW, the Petitioner, by and through his attorneys, [Your Attorney's Name], and for his petition for post-conviction relief, respectfully shows the Court as follows:

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 This petition for post-conviction relief is filed by [Your Full Name], the petitioner, who was convicted of [Offence] in the [Court Name] on [Date].

1.2 The petitioner seeks to have his conviction vacated and a new trial granted on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel.

2. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2.1 The petitioner was charged with [Offence] in the [Court Name] on [Date].

2.2 The charges stemmed from [Briefly describe the facts of the case].

2.3 The petitioner was represented by [Name of Attorney] at trial.

3. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

3.1 The petitioner alleges that his trial counsel, [Name of Attorney], provided ineffective assistance of counsel, which violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

3.2 The petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are based on the following:

3.3 Failure to Investigate and Present a Defense

3.3.1 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to adequately investigate the case and present a viable defense.

3.3.2 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to interview potential witnesses who could have provided exculpatory evidence.

3.3.3 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to obtain and present expert testimony that could have supported the petitioner's defense.

3.4 Failure to Object to Improper Evidence

3.4.1 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of improper evidence at trial.

3.4.2 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of hearsay evidence.

3.4.3 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to object to the admission of evidence that was irrelevant or prejudicial.

3.5 Failure to Advise on Plea Bargain

3.5.1 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to advise the petitioner of a plea bargain offer that was available to him.

3.5.2 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to adequately explain the terms of the plea bargain offer to the petitioner.

3.5.3 The petitioner's trial counsel failed to advise the petitioner of the potential consequences of rejecting the plea bargain offer.

4. PREJUDICE

4.1 The petitioner was prejudiced by his trial counsel's ineffective assistance of counsel.

4.2 The petitioner would have had a different outcome at trial if his trial counsel had provided effective assistance.

5. RELIEF REQUESTED

5.1 The petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

5.1.1 Vacate the petitioner's conviction.

5.1.2 Grant the petitioner a new trial.

6. CONCLUSION

6.1 For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant his petition for post-conviction relief.

Dated this [Date] day of [Month], [Year].

[Your Full Name]

Petitioner

[Your Attorney's Name]

Attorney for the Petitioner

[Your Attorney's Address]

[Your Attorney's Phone Number]

[Your Attorney's Email Address]


Answered by mwakili.com