Ask a lawyer:
Write a memorandum of law for a criminal defense motion

mwakili.com

Introduction

This memorandum of law is prepared in support of a criminal defense motion. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a comprehensive legal analysis and argumentation to support the motion. The memorandum will draw upon relevant provisions from the Constitution of Kenya, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, and pertinent case law.

Introduction
Legal Framework
- 2.1 Constitution of Kenya
- 2.2 Criminal Procedure Code
- 2.3 Evidence Act
Arguments in Support of the Motion
- 3.1 Violation of Constitutional Rights
- 3.2 Procedural Irregularities
- 3.3 Insufficiency of Evidence
Conclusion

1. Introduction

This memorandum of law is submitted in support of the defendant's motion to dismiss the charges brought against them. The motion is based on several grounds, including violations of constitutional rights, procedural irregularities, and insufficiency of evidence. The following sections will provide a detailed legal analysis of each ground.

2. Legal Framework

2.1 Constitution of Kenya

The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, is the supreme law of the land and provides the foundational legal framework for the protection of individual rights and the administration of justice. Relevant provisions include:

Article 50: Right to a fair hearing
Article 49: Rights of arrested persons
Article 25: Fundamental rights and freedoms that cannot be limited

2.2 Criminal Procedure Code

The Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) (Cap 75) outlines the procedural aspects of criminal law in Kenya. Relevant sections include:

Section 89: Institution of proceedings
Section 137: Form of charges and information
Section 202: Non-appearance of complainant

2.3 Evidence Act

The Evidence Act (Cap 80) governs the admissibility and relevance of evidence in Kenyan courts. Relevant sections include:

Section 107: Burden of proof
Section 25A: Confessions
Section 33: Statements by persons who cannot be called as witnesses

3. Arguments in Support of the Motion

3.1 Violation of Constitutional Rights

Article 50: Right to a Fair Hearing

Right to be Informed of the Charge: Article 50(2)(b) of the Constitution guarantees the right to be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it. If the charge sheet is vague or lacks specificity, it violates this constitutional right.
Right to Legal Representation: Article 50(2)(g) and (h) provide the right to choose and be represented by an advocate, and to be assigned an advocate at state expense if substantial injustice would otherwise result. If the defendant was not informed of this right, it constitutes a violation.
Right to Adequate Time and Facilities to Prepare a Defense: Article 50(2)(c) ensures the right to adequate time and facilities to prepare a defense. Any denial of access to evidence or undue haste in proceedings can be grounds for dismissal.

Article 49: Rights of Arrested Persons

Right to be Informed of the Reasons for Arrest: Article 49(1)(a) mandates that an arrested person must be informed promptly, in a language they understand, of the reasons for their arrest. Failure to do so invalidates the arrest.
Right to be Brought Before a Court: Article 49(1)(f) requires that an arrested person be brought before a court as soon as reasonably possible, but not later than 24 hours after being arrested. Any delay beyond this period without reasonable cause is a violation.

3.2 Procedural Irregularities

Section 89: Institution of Proceedings

Improper Institution of Proceedings: If the proceedings were instituted without proper authorization or in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of Section 89, the charges should be dismissed.

Section 137: Form of Charges and Information

Defective Charge Sheet: A charge sheet that does not comply with the requirements of Section 137, such as failing to specify the nature of the offense or the particulars of the alleged act, is defective and cannot sustain a prosecution.

Section 202: Non-appearance of Complainant

Dismissal for Non-appearance: If the complainant does not appear in court on the appointed date, Section 202 provides for the dismissal of the case unless the court sees a valid reason to adjourn.

3.3 Insufficiency of Evidence

Section 107: Burden of Proof

Prosecution's Burden: Under Section 107 of the Evidence Act, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. If the prosecution fails to provide sufficient evidence to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the charges should be dismissed.

Section 25A: Confessions

Admissibility of Confessions: Section 25A stipulates that confessions must be made before a judge, a magistrate, or a police officer of or above the rank of Chief Inspector, and must be recorded. Any confession obtained in violation of these requirements is inadmissible.

Section 33: Statements by Persons Who Cannot be Called as Witnesses

Hearsay Evidence: Section 33 restricts the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses. If the prosecution relies on such statements without meeting the exceptions provided in the Act, the evidence is inadmissible.

4. Conclusion

In light of the above arguments, it is evident that the defendant's constitutional rights have been violated, there have been significant procedural irregularities, and the evidence presented by the prosecution is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Therefore, the charges against the defendant should be dismissed.

This memorandum of law provides a detailed legal basis for the motion to dismiss, drawing upon relevant provisions from the Constitution of Kenya, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, and pertinent case law. The court is urged to consider these arguments and grant the motion to dismiss the charges against the defendant.