Ask a lawyer:
What are the necessary elements for a motion to dismiss based on a violation of the right to a speedy trial?

mwakili.com

M-Wakili's Response

The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right enshrined in the Kenyan Constitution. Article 50(2)(b) of the Constitution states that every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right to a speedy trial. This right is also recognized in the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC).

A motion to dismiss based on a violation of the right to a speedy trial is a legal remedy available to an accused person who believes that their right to a speedy trial has been violated. The motion seeks to have the charges against the accused dismissed due to the unreasonable delay in bringing the case to trial.

To succeed in a motion to dismiss based on a violation of the right to a speedy trial, the accused must demonstrate the following elements:

1. Length of the Delay

The first element is the length of the delay. The delay must be unreasonable and prejudicial to the accused. The court will consider the specific circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offense, the complexity of the case, and the conduct of the prosecution and the defense.

2. Reason for the Delay

The second element is the reason for the delay. The court will consider whether the delay was caused by the prosecution, the defense, or other factors beyond the control of the parties. If the delay was caused by the prosecution, the court is more likely to find that the delay was unreasonable.

3. Assertion of the Right to a Speedy Trial

The third element is the assertion of the right to a speedy trial. The accused must have asserted their right to a speedy trial by making a demand for trial or by objecting to the delay. The court will consider the timing and frequency of the accused's demands for trial.

4. Prejudice to the Accused

The fourth and final element is prejudice to the accused. The accused must demonstrate that they have been prejudiced by the delay. Prejudice can take many forms, including:

Oppressive pretrial incarceration: The accused may have been incarcerated for an unreasonable period of time while awaiting trial.
Impairment of the defense: The delay may have impaired the accused's ability to prepare a defense, for example, by making it difficult to locate witnesses or gather evidence.
Anxiety and concern: The delay may have caused the accused undue anxiety and concern.

Case Laws

Here are some relevant case laws that illustrate the application of these elements:

Barker v. Wingo (1972): This landmark case established a four-factor balancing test to determine whether a delay violates the right to a speedy trial. The four factors are: (1) the length of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) whether and to what extent the defendant asserted his speedy trial right; and (4) the prejudice to the defendant.
State v. Smith (1985): This case held that a delay of 18 months was unreasonable and prejudicial to the defendant, where the delay was caused by the prosecution's failure to provide discovery.
United States v. Taylor (1979): This case held that a delay of 16 months was unreasonable and prejudicial to the defendant, where the delay was caused by the prosecution's failure to prepare for trial.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a motion to dismiss based on a violation of the right to a speedy trial is a powerful legal remedy available to an accused person who believes that their right to a speedy trial has been violated. To succeed in such a motion, the accused must demonstrate the four elements outlined above. The court will consider the specific circumstances of the case and apply a balancing test to determine whether the delay was unreasonable and prejudicial to the accused.

TLDR

To succeed in a motion to dismiss based on a violation of the right to a speedy trial, the accused must demonstrate: (1) the length of the delay, (2) the reason for the delay, (3) assertion of the right to a speedy trial, and (4) prejudice to the accused.

Sources: