Ask a lawyer:
What are the most common mistakes to avoid when drafting a trademark coexistence agreement?

mwakili.com

Introduction

A trademark coexistence agreement is a legal instrument used by two or more parties to delineate the terms under which their respective trademarks can coexist without causing confusion or infringing on each other's rights. This type of agreement is particularly useful when the trademarks in question are similar but are used in different markets or geographical areas. Drafting such an agreement requires meticulous attention to detail to ensure that it is legally enforceable and serves the interests of all parties involved. In Kenya, the legal framework governing trademarks is primarily found in the Trade Marks Act (Cap 506) and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. This article will outline the most common mistakes to avoid when drafting a trademark coexistence agreement, citing relevant Kenyan laws and regulations.

Lack of Clear Definitions
Failure to Conduct a Comprehensive Trademark Search
Inadequate Geographical Scope
Ambiguous Terms and Conditions
Ignoring Future Business Expansion
Failure to Address Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Non-Compliance with Kenyan Trademark Laws
Lack of Proper Execution and Registration

1. Lack of Clear Definitions

Sources: Trade Marks Act (Cap 506), Section 2

Importance of Definitions: Clear definitions are crucial for avoiding ambiguities that could lead to disputes. Terms such as "trademark," "territory," "goods and services," and "use" should be explicitly defined.
Legal Implications: According to Section 2 of the Trade Marks Act, a trademark must be clearly defined to be legally recognized. Ambiguous definitions can render the agreement unenforceable.

2. Failure to Conduct a Comprehensive Trademark Search

Sources: Trade Marks Act (Cap 506), Section 21

Trademark Search: Before drafting the agreement, a comprehensive trademark search should be conducted to ensure that the trademarks in question are not already registered or in use by another party.
Legal Requirement: Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act mandates that a trademark must be unique and not likely to cause confusion. Failure to conduct a thorough search can result in legal challenges and invalidate the agreement.

3. Inadequate Geographical Scope

Sources: Trade Marks Act (Cap 506), Section 22

Geographical Limitations: The agreement should clearly specify the geographical areas where each party is allowed to use their trademark.
Legal Considerations: Section 22 of the Trade Marks Act allows for the registration of trademarks in specific geographical areas. An inadequate geographical scope can lead to conflicts and legal disputes.

4. Ambiguous Terms and Conditions

Sources: Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Article 40

Clarity in Terms: The terms and conditions of the agreement should be clear and unambiguous. This includes the duration of the agreement, the rights and obligations of each party, and the conditions under which the agreement can be terminated.
Property Rights: Article 40 of the Constitution of Kenya protects intellectual property rights. Ambiguous terms can lead to violations of these rights and result in legal challenges.

5. Ignoring Future Business Expansion

Sources: Trade Marks Act (Cap 506), Section 24

Future Considerations: The agreement should take into account the potential for future business expansion. This includes provisions for the use of the trademark in new markets or for new products and services.
Legal Framework: Section 24 of the Trade Marks Act allows for the amendment of trademark registrations to include new goods and services. Ignoring future expansion can limit business growth and lead to conflicts.

6. Failure to Address Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Sources: Arbitration Act (Cap 49), Section 4

Dispute Resolution: The agreement should include a clear mechanism for resolving disputes, such as arbitration or mediation.
Legal Provisions: Section 4 of the Arbitration Act provides for the resolution of disputes through arbitration. Failure to include a dispute resolution mechanism can result in prolonged legal battles.

7. Non-Compliance with Kenyan Trademark Laws

Sources: Trade Marks Act (Cap 506), Section 14

Legal Compliance: The agreement must comply with all relevant Kenyan trademark laws and regulations.
Legal Consequences: Section 14 of the Trade Marks Act outlines the requirements for the registration and use of trademarks. Non-compliance can render the agreement invalid and result in legal penalties.

8. Lack of Proper Execution and Registration

Sources: Registration of Documents Act (Cap 285), Section 4

Execution and Registration: The agreement should be properly executed and registered with the relevant authorities to ensure its enforceability.
Legal Requirements: Section 4 of the Registration of Documents Act mandates the registration of certain documents to make them legally binding. Failure to properly execute and register the agreement can result in its invalidation.

Conclusion

Drafting a trademark coexistence agreement requires careful consideration of various legal aspects to ensure that it is enforceable and serves the interests of all parties involved. By avoiding common mistakes such as lack of clear definitions, failure to conduct a comprehensive trademark search, inadequate geographical scope, ambiguous terms and conditions, ignoring future business expansion, failure to address dispute resolution mechanisms, non-compliance with Kenyan trademark laws, and lack of proper execution and registration, parties can create a robust and legally sound agreement. Adhering to the relevant provisions of the Trade Marks Act, the Constitution of Kenya, the Arbitration Act, and the Registration of Documents Act will help in achieving this objective.