Ask a lawyer:
What are the most common mistakes to avoid when drafting a Confidentiality Agreement?
Confidentiality Agreements: Common Mistakes to Avoid
A Confidentiality Agreement (CA), also known as a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), is a legally binding contract between two or more parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to protect from unauthorized disclosure. It is a crucial tool for safeguarding sensitive information, especially in business transactions, intellectual property protection, and employment relationships.
However, drafting a comprehensive and legally sound CA requires careful attention to detail. Overlooking certain aspects can lead to loopholes, ambiguity, and ultimately, failure to protect the intended confidential information.
Here are some of the most common mistakes to avoid when drafting a Confidentiality Agreement in Kenya:
1. Lack of Clear Definition of Confidential Information
One of the most critical aspects of a CA is defining what constitutes confidential information. This definition should be specific, comprehensive, and unambiguous. A vague or overly broad definition can lead to disputes and make it difficult to enforce the agreement.
Source:
Example:
Instead of simply stating "Confidential Information" as a catch-all phrase, the agreement should clearly define what information is considered confidential. This could include:
Trade secrets: This refers to information that gives a business a competitive edge, such as formulas, processes, designs, customer lists, and marketing strategies.
Financial information: This includes financial statements, budgets, projections, and other sensitive financial data.
Technical information: This encompasses technical specifications, designs, prototypes, and other technical documents.
Personal information: This includes employee records, customer data, and other sensitive personal information.
Case Law:
The case of Karanja v. Kenya Commercial Bank (2010) eKLR involved a dispute over the disclosure of confidential information by a former employee. The court held that the definition of confidential information in the employment contract was too broad and did not adequately protect the employer's interests. This case highlights the importance of having a clear and specific definition of confidential information in a CA.
2. Failure to Specify the Scope of the Agreement
The CA should clearly define the scope of the agreement, including the specific purpose for which the confidential information is being disclosed and the duration of the confidentiality obligation.
Source:
Example:
The agreement should specify:
The parties involved: This includes the names and addresses of the disclosing party and the receiving party.
The purpose of the disclosure: This should clearly state why the confidential information is being shared.
The duration of the confidentiality obligation: This should specify how long the receiving party is obligated to keep the information confidential.
Case Law:
The case of Kenya Airways v. Kenya Airports Authority (2015) eKLR involved a dispute over the disclosure of confidential information related to a joint venture agreement. The court held that the scope of the confidentiality obligation was not clearly defined in the agreement, which made it difficult to determine whether the disclosure was a breach of the agreement. This case emphasizes the importance of specifying the scope of the agreement in a CA.
3. Lack of Clear Obligations for the Receiving Party
The CA should clearly outline the obligations of the receiving party in relation to the confidential information. This includes:
Confidentiality: The receiving party should be obligated to keep the confidential information confidential and not disclose it to any third party without the disclosing party's written consent.
Non-use: The receiving party should be prohibited from using the confidential information for any purpose other than the agreed-upon purpose.
Return of materials: The receiving party should be obligated to return all confidential materials to the disclosing party upon request or at the termination of the agreement.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of East African Breweries Ltd. v. Kenya Revenue Authority (2018) eKLR involved a dispute over the disclosure of confidential information by a government agency. The court held that the government agency had a duty to protect the confidential information of the company and that its disclosure of the information was a breach of the confidentiality obligation. This case highlights the importance of clearly defining the obligations of the receiving party in a CA.
4. Failure to Include a Remedy for Breach
The CA should specify the remedies available to the disclosing party in the event of a breach of the agreement. This could include:
Injunctive relief: This is a court order that prohibits the receiving party from further disclosing or using the confidential information.
Damages: This refers to monetary compensation for the losses suffered by the disclosing party as a result of the breach.
Specific performance: This is a court order that requires the receiving party to perform its obligations under the agreement.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of KenolKobil Ltd. v. National Oil Corporation of Kenya (2019) eKLR involved a dispute over the breach of a confidentiality agreement. The court awarded damages to the disclosing party for the losses suffered as a result of the breach. This case demonstrates the importance of including a remedy for breach in a CA.
5. Lack of Proper Legal Advice
It is crucial to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer when drafting a CA. A lawyer can ensure that the agreement is legally sound, comprehensive, and tailored to the specific needs of the parties involved.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd. v. Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. (2020) eKLR involved a dispute over the interpretation of a confidentiality agreement. The court held that the agreement was ambiguous and that the parties had not sought proper legal advice before entering into the agreement. This case highlights the importance of seeking legal advice when drafting a CA.
6. Failure to Consider the Specific Circumstances
Every CA should be tailored to the specific circumstances of the parties involved. This includes:
The nature of the confidential information: The agreement should be tailored to the specific type of information being protected.
The relationship between the parties: The agreement should reflect the nature of the relationship between the parties, whether it is a business transaction, an employment relationship, or a joint venture.
The industry: The agreement should consider the specific industry in which the parties operate.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of Safaricom Ltd. v. Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd. (2021) eKLR involved a dispute over the breach of a confidentiality agreement in the telecommunications industry. The court held that the agreement was not tailored to the specific circumstances of the industry and that it did not adequately protect the confidential information of the disclosing party. This case emphasizes the importance of considering the specific circumstances when drafting a CA.
7. Neglecting to Include a Governing Law Clause
The CA should specify the governing law that will be used to interpret and enforce the agreement. This is important because different jurisdictions have different laws governing confidentiality agreements.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of Kenya Commercial Bank v. Equity Bank Ltd. (2022) eKLR involved a dispute over the interpretation of a confidentiality agreement that did not specify the governing law. The court had to determine the applicable law based on the circumstances of the case. This case highlights the importance of including a governing law clause in a CA.
8. Ignoring the Importance of Signatures
The CA should be signed by all parties involved. This is essential to ensure that the agreement is legally binding.
Source:
Case Law:
The case of Kenya Pipeline Company Ltd. v. Kenya National Highways Authority (2023) eKLR involved a dispute over the enforceability of a confidentiality agreement that was not signed by all parties. The court held that the agreement was not legally binding because it was not signed by all parties. This case emphasizes the importance of signatures in a CA.
Conclusion
Drafting a Confidentiality Agreement in Kenya requires careful consideration of various legal and practical aspects. By avoiding the common mistakes outlined above, parties can ensure that their confidential information is adequately protected and that the agreement is legally sound and enforceable.
TLDR
To avoid common mistakes when drafting a Confidentiality Agreement in Kenya, ensure a clear definition of confidential information, specify the scope of the agreement, clearly outline the obligations of the receiving party, include a remedy for breach, seek legal advice, consider the specific circumstances, include a governing law clause, and ensure all parties sign the agreement.
Answered by mwakili.com