M-Wakili

Ask a lawyer:
What are the controversial parts of the Finance bill?

The Finance Bill 2024, introduced as part of Kenya's budget for the next fiscal year, has been met with significant controversy, leading to widespread protests and even violence. The bill proposed several changes to the Kenyan tax system, including tax increases, which sparked public outrage.

Table of Contents

  1. Controversial Provisions

    1. Housing Levy

    2. Digital Content Tax

    3. Excise Duty on Betting and Gaming

    4. Value Added Tax (VAT) on Fuel

    5. Increase in Income Tax Rates

  2. Public Reaction and Protests

  3. Government Response

  4. Withdrawal of the Bill

1. Controversial Provisions

1.1 Housing Levy

The Finance Bill proposed a 1.5% housing levy on all employed individuals' salaries. This levy was intended to fund the development of affordable housing in Kenya. However, critics argued that the levy was unfair and would disproportionately burden low-income earners. They also questioned the effectiveness of the levy in achieving its intended goal.

Sources:

  • ABC News

  • The East African

1.2 Digital Content Tax

The bill proposed a 15% digital content tax on online services such as streaming platforms, social media, and online gaming. This tax was intended to generate revenue from the growing digital economy. However, critics argued that the tax would stifle innovation and discourage investment in the digital sector. They also expressed concerns about the potential for the tax to be passed on to consumers, increasing the cost of accessing online services.

Sources:

1.3 Excise Duty on Betting and Gaming

The bill proposed an increase in excise duty on betting and gaming activities. This was intended to discourage gambling and generate revenue for the government. However, critics argued that the increase would drive gambling activities underground, making them harder to regulate and potentially increasing the risk of money laundering.

Sources:

1.4 Value Added Tax (VAT) on Fuel

The bill proposed the introduction of VAT on fuel, which was previously exempt. This was intended to generate revenue for the government and reduce fuel consumption. However, critics argued that the VAT would increase the cost of living for Kenyans, particularly those who rely on public transport or own vehicles. They also expressed concerns about the potential for the tax to lead to inflation.

Sources:

1.5 Increase in Income Tax Rates

The bill proposed an increase in income tax rates for high-income earners. This was intended to generate revenue for the government and reduce income inequality. However, critics argued that the increase would discourage investment and economic growth. They also expressed concerns about the potential for the tax to lead to tax avoidance and evasion.

Sources:

2. Public Reaction and Protests

The proposed provisions of the Finance Bill sparked widespread public outrage and protests across Kenya. Kenyans from all walks of life took to the streets to express their dissatisfaction with the bill, arguing that it would place an undue burden on ordinary citizens. The protests were initially peaceful but turned violent in some areas, leading to clashes with police and property damage.

Sources:

3. Government Response

The Kenyan government initially defended the Finance Bill, arguing that the proposed tax measures were necessary to address the country's economic challenges. However, in the face of mounting public pressure and widespread protests, the government made some concessions. The government removed some of the most controversial provisions from the bill, including the housing levy and the digital content tax.

Sources:

4. Withdrawal of the Bill

Despite the government's concessions, the protests continued, and the situation escalated. The Kenyan Parliament passed the Finance Bill, but the protests intensified, leading to violence and property damage. In a sudden announcement, Kenyan President William Ruto withdrew his support for the Finance Bill, effectively killing the bill.

Sources:

The withdrawal of the Finance Bill was a significant victory for the protesters and a sign of the government's willingness to listen to public concerns. It remains to be seen what measures the government will take to address the country's economic challenges in the future.

Answered by mwakili.com