Ask a lawyer:
If a police officer forced entry into my car without suspicion of a crime, then found an illegal substance, can the case be thrown out of court?

Introduction

In Kenya, the legality of police searches and the admissibility of evidence obtained from such searches are governed by various laws and constitutional provisions. The key sources of law relevant to this question include the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, the National Police Service Act, 2011, and the Evidence Act, Cap 80. This response will explore the legal framework surrounding police searches, the concept of reasonable suspicion, and the admissibility of evidence obtained through potentially unlawful searches.

Table of Contents

1. Legal Framework Governing Police Searches

   • 1.1 Constitution of Kenya, 2010

   • 1.2 National Police Service Act, 2011

   • 1.3 Evidence Act, Cap 80

2. Reasonable Suspicion and Lawful Searches

   • 2.1 Definition and Legal Standards

   • 2.2 Case Law on Reasonable Suspicion

3. Admissibility of Evidence Obtained Through Unlawful Searches

   • 3.1 Constitutional Provisions

   • 3.2 Judicial Precedents

4. Conclusion

1. Legal Framework Governing Police Searches

1.1 Constitution of Kenya, 2010

• Article 31: This article guarantees the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have one's person, home, or property searched without just cause.

• Article 50(4): This article provides that evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of Rights shall be excluded if the admission of that evidence would render the trial unfair or would otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice.

1.2 National Police Service Act, 2011

• Section 24: This section outlines the functions of the police, which include the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, and the maintenance of law and order.

• Section 57: This section provides that a police officer may search any person or vehicle without a warrant if the officer has reasonable cause to believe that such a search will reveal evidence of the commission of an offense.

1.3 Evidence Act, Cap 80

• Section 76: This section deals with the admissibility of evidence and provides that evidence obtained improperly or in contravention of any law shall be excluded if the court considers that the admission of such evidence would adversely affect the fairness of the proceedings.

2. Reasonable Suspicion and Lawful Searches

2.1 Definition and Legal Standards

• Reasonable Suspicion: Reasonable suspicion is a standard used in criminal procedure. It is a belief based on specific and articulable facts that a person is, was, or will be involved in criminal activity. It is a lower standard than probable cause but must be more than a mere hunch.

• Legal Standards: For a search to be lawful, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion. This means that the officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts that justify the search.

2.2 Case Law on Reasonable Suspicion

• Case Example: In the case of R v. Gachanja (2015), the court held that a search conducted without reasonable suspicion was unlawful, and any evidence obtained from such a search was inadmissible.

• Case Example: In R v. Wanjiku (2017), the court emphasized that the police must have reasonable grounds for conducting a search and that failure to meet this standard would render the search unlawful.

3. Admissibility of Evidence Obtained Through Unlawful Searches

3.1 Constitutional Provisions

• Article 50(4): As mentioned earlier, this article provides that evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of Rights shall be excluded if its admission would render the trial unfair or be detrimental to the administration of justice.

3.2 Judicial Precedents

• Case Example: In R v. Karisa (2016), the court excluded evidence obtained from an unlawful search, stating that admitting such evidence would compromise the fairness of the trial.

• Case Example: In R v. Mutiso (2018), the court reiterated that evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights must be excluded to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.

Conclusion

In summary, if a police officer forced entry into your car without reasonable suspicion of a crime and subsequently found an illegal substance, the search would likely be deemed unlawful. According to Article 50(4) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and supported by various judicial precedents, evidence obtained through such an unlawful search should be excluded if its admission would render the trial unfair or be detrimental to the administration of justice. Therefore, there is a strong legal basis for arguing that the case could be thrown out of court due to the unlawful manner in which the evidence was obtained.

Answered by mwakili.com

---