Ask a lawyer:
If a police officer forced entry into my car without suspicion of a crime, then found an illegal substance, can the case be thrown out of court?
Introduction
In Kenya, the legal framework governing searches and seizures by police officers is primarily outlined in the Constitution of Kenya, the National Police Service Act, and the Criminal Procedure Code. The legality of evidence obtained through searches and seizures is a critical aspect of criminal proceedings. If a police officer conducts a search without reasonable suspicion or a warrant, the admissibility of any evidence found during such a search can be challenged in court.
Table of Contents
Legal Framework for Searches and Seizures
1.1 Constitutional Provisions
1.2 National Police Service Act
1.3 Criminal Procedure Code
Reasonable Suspicion and Warrants
2.1 Definition of Reasonable Suspicion
2.2 Requirement for Warrants
Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence
3.1 Doctrine of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
3.2 Case Law and Precedents
Steps to Challenge Illegally Obtained Evidence
4.1 Filing a Motion to Suppress Evidence
4.2 Burden of Proof
Conclusion
1. Legal Framework for Searches and Seizures
1.1 Constitutional Provisions
The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, provides robust protections against unlawful searches and seizures. Article 31 of the Constitution guarantees the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have one's person, home, or property searched without just cause.
(Source: Kenya Law - Constitution of Kenya ↗)
1.2 National Police Service Act
The National Police Service Act, No. 11A of 2011, outlines the powers and duties of police officers, including the conditions under which they may conduct searches. Section 57 of the Act stipulates that a police officer must have reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime before conducting a search.
(Source: National Police Service Act ↗)
1.3 Criminal Procedure Code
The Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) further elaborates on the procedures for searches and seizures. Sections 118 and 119 of the CPC require that searches be conducted with a warrant issued by a magistrate, except in certain exigent circumstances where obtaining a warrant is impractical.
(Source: Kenya Law - Criminal Procedure Code ↗)
2. Reasonable Suspicion and Warrants
2.1 Definition of Reasonable Suspicion
Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard that requires a police officer to have a factual basis for suspecting that a person is involved in criminal activity. This standard is lower than probable cause but must be based on specific and articulable facts.
2.2 Requirement for Warrants
Generally, police officers are required to obtain a warrant before conducting a search. A warrant must be issued by a magistrate based on probable cause. However, there are exceptions to this requirement, such as when there is an imminent threat to public safety or when evidence is at risk of being destroyed.
3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence
3.1 Doctrine of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
The doctrine of the "fruit of the poisonous tree" is a legal metaphor used to describe evidence that is obtained illegally. Under this doctrine, any evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure is inadmissible in court. This principle is designed to deter law enforcement from violating constitutional rights.
3.2 Case Law and Precedents
Kenyan courts have consistently held that evidence obtained through illegal means is inadmissible. In the case of Republic v. Gachanja, the High Court ruled that evidence obtained without a warrant or reasonable suspicion could not be used in court. This precedent reinforces the importance of adhering to legal procedures during searches and seizures.
4. Steps to Challenge Illegally Obtained Evidence
4.1 Filing a Motion to Suppress Evidence
If you believe that evidence was obtained illegally, you can file a motion to suppress the evidence. This motion must be filed before the trial begins and should outline the reasons why the evidence should be excluded.
4.2 Burden of Proof
The burden of proof in a motion to suppress lies with the defendant. You must demonstrate that the search was conducted without reasonable suspicion or a warrant and that the evidence obtained is directly linked to the illegal search.
Conclusion
In summary, if a police officer forced entry into your car without reasonable suspicion or a warrant and found an illegal substance, you have grounds to challenge the admissibility of that evidence in court. The Constitution of Kenya, the National Police Service Act, and the Criminal Procedure Code provide robust protections against unlawful searches and seizures. By filing a motion to suppress the evidence, you can argue that the evidence was obtained illegally and should be excluded from the trial.
Sources:
Answered by mwakili.com