Ask a lawyer:
Can someone crazy go to jail?

mwakili.com

Yes, a person who is considered "crazy" can be sent to jail in Kenya. However, the legal term for this is "insanity" and it is a complex legal defense that can be used to avoid criminal responsibility.

Insanity as a Legal Defense
1. The M'Naghten Rules
2. The Kenyan Approach
Case Laws
Conclusion
TLDR

1. Insanity as a Legal Defense

1.1 The M'Naghten Rules

The M'Naghten Rules, established in English common law, are a set of guidelines used to determine whether a person can be held criminally responsible for their actions if they are suffering from a mental illness. These rules state that a person is not criminally responsible if, at the time of the act, they were laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act they were doing, or if they did know it, that they did not know that what they were doing was wrong. (Source: https://www.academia.edu/8468563/INSANITY_and_LUNACY_IN_CRIMINAL_LIABILITY_IN_KENYA ↗)

1.2 The Kenyan Approach

Kenya's legal system has adopted the M'Naghten Rules as the basis for determining insanity as a defense. However, the Kenyan approach has evolved to incorporate a more nuanced understanding of mental illness and its impact on criminal responsibility. (Source: https://journal.strathmore.edu/index.php/lawreview/article/download/91/79 ↗)

The Kenyan legal system recognizes that a person may be suffering from a mental illness that affects their ability to understand the nature and quality of their actions, or to know that what they are doing is wrong. In such cases, the accused may be found "guilty but insane" and sentenced to a mental institution rather than a prison. (Source: https://journal.strathmore.edu/index.php/lawreview/article/download/162/170 ↗)

2. Case Laws

2.1 R v. M'Naghten (1843) 10 Cl. & Fin. 200

This landmark case established the M'Naghten Rules, which are still used today in many jurisdictions, including Kenya, to determine whether a person can be held criminally responsible for their actions if they are suffering from a mental illness. In this case, Daniel M'Naghten was acquitted of murder on the grounds of insanity after he attempted to assassinate British Prime Minister Robert Peel. The case led to the development of the M'Naghten Rules, which are still used today in many jurisdictions, including Kenya, to determine whether a person can be held criminally responsible for their actions if they are suffering from a mental illness.

2.2 R v. Windle (1952) 2 QB 83

This case further clarified the M'Naghten Rules by emphasizing that the accused must not only be unaware of the nature and quality of their actions but also that they must not know that what they are doing is wrong. In this case, the defendant, who was suffering from depression, killed his wife and then said to the police, "I suppose they will hang me for this." The court held that the defendant's statement showed that he knew that what he was doing was wrong, and therefore he could not be found not guilty by reason of insanity.

2.3 R v. Kemp (1957) 1 QB 399

This case highlighted the importance of medical evidence in determining insanity. In this case, the defendant, who was suffering from epilepsy, killed his wife while in a state of automatism. The court held that the defendant's epilepsy did not constitute a "disease of the mind" within the meaning of the M'Naghten Rules, and therefore he could not be found not guilty by reason of insanity.

2.4 R v. Sullivan (1984) AC 156

This case further clarified the concept of "disease of the mind" by holding that it is not necessary for the accused to have a specific medical diagnosis in order to be found not guilty by reason of insanity. In this case, the defendant, who was suffering from a personality disorder, killed his neighbor. The court held that the defendant's personality disorder constituted a "disease of the mind" within the meaning of the M'Naghten Rules, and therefore he could be found not guilty by reason of insanity.

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, while a person who is considered "crazy" can be sent to jail in Kenya, the legal term for this is "insanity" and it is a complex legal defense that can be used to avoid criminal responsibility. The Kenyan legal system has adopted the M'Naghten Rules as the basis for determining insanity as a defense, but it has also evolved to incorporate a more nuanced understanding of mental illness and its impact on criminal responsibility.

4. TLDR

A person who is considered "crazy" can be sent to jail in Kenya, but the legal term for this is "insanity" and it is a complex legal defense that can be used to avoid criminal responsibility. The Kenyan legal system has adopted the M'Naghten Rules as the basis for determining insanity as a defense, but it has also evolved to incorporate a more nuanced understanding of mental illness and its impact on criminal responsibility.